Detailed View

A detailed view of vendor user-centered design processes, summative testing methodologies, and summative testing results is illustrated below.  We assigned five (5) points to each of these three dimensions for a total of 15 possible points. A detailed explanation of the point assignment process can be found on the methodology page. The table below shows the point assignments and specific details from the vendor safety enhanced design reports.

How to Read this Table:

For each dimension and sub-component the table shows the points assigned to that vendor and below the point value is the specific data for that vendor as extracted from the vendor report retrieved from the ONC's certified health product list. The table can be sorted by each dimension and sub-component by clicking on the arrows next to the header names.

how_to_read.updated.10.12

EHR Vendor UCD Process Testing Methodology Testing Results Total Score
Reported Process

Max pts:5
 Participants

Max pts:1
 Clinical Expertise

Max pts:2
 Use Cases

Max pts:1
 Metrics

Max pts:1
 Effectiveness

Max pts:3
 Improvements

Max pts:2

Allscripts Enterprise EHR

v11.4.1

 5

5

NIST 7741

1

18.2

2

100%

 1

1

Detailed

1

Complete

 84.8

3

84.8

2

Detailed

 15

15

Allscripts Sunrise Acute

v15.1-c INPATIENT

 5

5

NIST 7741

1

18.8

2

100%

 1

1

Detailed

1

Complete

 94.4

3

94.4

2

Detailed

 15

15

Amazing Chart

v7.0

 5

5

ISO 9241-210

0

9.3

2

100%

 0.5

.5

Vague

1

Complete

 93.4

3

93.4

.5

Scant

 12

12

Athena Clinicals

v14.9

 5

5

Own process

1

19.1

2

100%

 1

1

Detailed

1

Complete

 93.8

3

93.8

.5

Scant

 13.5

13.5

Cerner

Powerchart INPATIENT 2012.01.34

 5

5

Own process

.5

12.4

2

100%

 1

1

Detailed

1

Complete

 86.1

3

86.1

.5

Scant

 13

13

Dr Systems

eHR MU v2.0

 0

0

No stated process

0

3.8

.5

20%

 0.5

.5

Vague

1

Complete

 90.8

3

90.8

2

Detailed

 7

7

E-MD

Solution Series v8

 5

5

ISO 9241-210

1

22

2

100%

 1

1

Detailed

0

Incomplete

 0.0

0

N/A

2

Detailed

 11

11

eClinical Works

Version 10

 0

0

No stated process

0

4

.5

50%

 0

0

No Details

1

Complete

 82.1

3

82.1

.5

Scant

 5

5

Epic Systems

EpiCare Ambulatory 2014 (Epic2012)

 5

5

Own process

1

51.7

2

100%

 0.5

.5

Vague

0

Incomplete

 0.0

0

N/A

.5

Scant

 9

9

GE Healthcare 1

Centricity Enterprise v6.11

5

5

ISO 62366

.5

14.1

2

100%

 1

1

Detailed

1

Complete

 74.5

0

74.5

2

Detailed

 11.5

11.5

Greenway

PrimeSUITE 2014(17.0)

 0

0

No stated process

0

9.7

.5

80%

 0.5

.5

Vague

1

Complete

 86.5

3

86.5

2

Detailed

 7

7

McKesson

Paragon 12&2.0 INPATIENT

 5

5

NIST 7741

1

17

2

100%

 0.5

.5

Vague

1

Complete

 80.6

3

80.6

2

Detailed

 14.5

14.5

McKesson Specialty Health

iKnowMedEHR v6.7

 5

5

NIST 7741

1

16.1

2

100%

 1

1

Detailed

1

Complete

 80.3

3

80.3

2

Detailed

 15

15

Medhost

EDIS v4.4 INPATIENT

 5

5

Own process

0

5

2

100%

 0

0

No Details

1

Complete

 99.99

3

100

.5

Scant

 11.5

11.5

Medical Information Technology

MPM 5.6.6

 5

5

Own process

.5

10.4

2

100%

 0

0

No Details

1

Complete

 94.9

3

94.9

2

Detailed

 13.5

13.5

Meditech Magic

Core HCIS 5.66 INPATIENT

 5

5

Own process

0

5

2

100%

 0

0

No Details

1

Complete

 99.99

3

100

2

Detailed

 13

13

Modernizing Medicine

EMA 4.0.0.2

 5

5

Own process

1

24

.5

54%

 0.5

.5

Vague

1

Complete

 55.8

0

55.8

.5

Scant

 8.5

8.5

Nextgen Healthcare

Ambulatory 5.8.2

 0

0

No stated process

.5

13

2

100%

 1

1

Detailed

1

Complete

 81.0

3

81

2

Detailed

 9.5

9.5

Practice Fusion

v3.1

 5

5

ISO 9241-210

0

7.5

2

100%

 0.5

.5

Vague

1

Complete

 86.4

3

86.4

2

Detailed

 13.5

13.5

SRSsoft

v9

 5

5

ISO 9241-210

0

9.5

.5

84.6%

 0.5

.5

Vague

1

Complete

 94.1

3

94.1

2

Detailed

 12

12
Non-Endorsement Disclaimer: In publishing this report, neither MedStar Health nor the American Medical Association is endorsing any EHRs or other technology. This report was not sponsored, funded or in any way facilitated by any EHR or similar technology vendor. User decisions regarding the selection of EHR technologies, products and services must take into account many varied characteristics, which are beyond the scope of this report.

Footnotes

1. The UCD process for the GE Centricity ambulatory product was stated in the CHPL report for the inpatient GE Centricity product.